Chapter 10
Approximate
theories for solids with special shapes:
 rods, beams, membranes, plates and shells
10.6 Simplified versions of general shell theory  flat plates and membranes
In
many practical cases of interest the general equations of shell theory can be
vastly simplified. In this section, we
summarize the governing equations for a number of special solids, including
equations governing behavior of flat plates, and membranes.
10.6.1 Flat plates with small
out-of-plane deflections and negligible in-plane loading
This
is the simplest version of plate theory, and is used in most practical
applications. The figure illustrates the problem to be solved. An initially flat plate, which has uniform
(small) thickness h, Young’s
modulus   Poisson’s ratio   and mass density  , is subjected to a distributed force   per unit area (acting vertically
upwards). The edge of the plate can be
constrained in various ways, as discussed in more detail below.  We wish to determine its deformed shape,
as well as the internal forces and moments in the plate.
All
vector and tensor quantities can be expressed in a fixed Cartesian basis   illustrated in the figure. The covariant and reciprocal basis vectors
are identical so there is no need to use the system of raised and lowered
indices that was needed in general shell theory. In addition, since the basis
vectors are independent of position, the Christoffel symbols are all
zero. We continue to use the
convention that Greek subscripts can have values 1 or 2, while Latin
subscripts may have values 1,2,3.
We make the following
assumptions
- The variation of
displacements within the plate conforms to the usual approximations of
Kirchhoff plate theory, i.e. material fibers that are perpendicular to
the mid-plane of the undeformed plate remain perpendicular to the
mid-plane of the deformed plate, and stretching transverse to the
mid-plane is neglected.
- The displacement of
the mid-plane of the plate has the form
 ,
i.e. material points on the mid-plane of the plate deflect only
transverse to the plate.
- The mid-plane
deflection is small compared with the dimensions of the plate, and the
slope of the deflected plate is small, so that
 Â for all  ;
second order terms in displacement are ignored in all the strain
definitions and also the equilibrium equations.
The following (approximate)
results can then be extracted from the general shell equations:
Kinematics:
 The
curvature change tensor is  ,
while the in-plane strain tensor is  .
 The normal
vector to the deformed plate can be approximated as 
 The
displacement field in the plate is approximated as 
 The
(infinitesimal) strain field in the plate is approximated as  .Â
Kinetics
 The
external force is characterized by the force per unit area  Â acting on the surface of the plate;
 The
in-plane stress tensor  ,
so the internal forces are completely characterized by the internal moment
tensor  Â and transverse force tensor  ;
 The
components  Â represent the vertical force per unit length
acting on an internal plane perpendicular to the  Â direction;
 The
physical significance of  Â is illustrated in the figure:  Â characterizes the moment per unit length
acting on planes inside the shell that are normal to the  Â direction, while  Â characterizes the moment per unit length
acting on planes that are normal to  . Note that   represents a moment about the   axis, while   is a moment acting about the   axis.
Moment-Curvature
relation reduces to 
Equations
of Motion are approximated by
 Â 
(rotational
inertia has been neglected). These equations can be combined to eliminate V

and
can also be expressed in terms of the displacements as

Edge
boundary conditions. The edge of the plate is characterized by a
curve C that lies in the mid-plane of the shell, encircling   in a counterclockwise sense.  We let   denote arc-length measured around C from some convenient origin, and use
 Â and  Â denote unit vectors tangent and normal to C.Â
Elementary plate theory offers the following choices of boundary
condition for each point on C:
- Part of the boundary
of the plate
 Â may be clamped, i.e.
rotations and displacement of the boundary are completely prevented. The
transverse displacement must then satisfy  Â on  .
- Part of the boundary
 Â may be simply supported, i.e. the boundary of the plate is
prevented from moving, but is permitted to rotate freely about the
tangent vector  . In this case the transverse
displacement and internal moment must satisfy

- Part of the boundary
 Â may be free, i.e. the boundary is free to both translate and
rotate. In this case the
transverse shear force and internal moment must satisfy

More general boundary
conditions, in which the edge of the plate is subjected to prescribed forces
and moments, can also be derived from the results given in Section 10.5.8 if
this is of interest.
Strain
energy and kinetic energy of a flat plate: The formula for the strain energy and kinetic
energy of the plate can be expressed in terms of displacements as

The second term in the
integral for the kinetic energy represents the energy associated with the
plate’s out-of-plane rotation, and can be ignored in most practical
applications.
10.6.2 Flat plates with small
out-of-plane deflections and significant in-plane loading
This
version of plate theory is used to model plates that are subjected to substantial
loading parallel to the plane of the plate (usually due to loads applied at
its boundaries). The theory assumes
that displacements are small enough to use linearized measures of strain, but
includes nonlinear terms associated with the in-plane loading in the
equilibrium equations. The theory can
be used to calculate buckling loads for plates, but does not accurately model
their deformation if the buckling loads are exceeded.
The
problem to be solved is stated in Sect 10.6.1.  The majority of the governing equations
are identical to those of standard plate theory, given in 10.6.1 Â the equations which need to be modified to
account for transverse forces are listed below.
Kinematics:
 The
in-plane strain tensor is approximated as 
 The
displacement field in the plate is approximated as 
 The
(infinitesimal) strain field in the plate is approximated as  ,
where the components of the curvature change tensor are given in 10.6.1.Â
Kinetics
 The
external force consists of a force per unit area  Â acting on the surface of the plate.
 The
internal forces are characterized as described in 10.6.1, except that the stress
resultant tensor  Â is nonzero. The components of the stress
resultant tensor can be interpreted as illustrated in the figure:  Â represents the force per unit length, acting
in the  Â direction, on an internal plane
perpendicular to the   direction within the plate. Â
Stress
resultant-strain and Moment-Curvature relations
 Â Â Â Â Â 
Equations
of motion  reduce to
 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 
The
second two equations can be combined to eliminate V

This
result can also be expressed in terms of displacement as

Edge
boundary conditions. The edge
of the plate is characterized as described in Section 10.6.1. Boundary conditions for the transverse
displacement  ,
transverse force  Â and internal moment  Â are identical to those listed in
10.6.2.  In addition, the in-plane
displacements or forces must satisfy the following boundary conditions:
- On part of the
boundary of the plate
 ,
one or more components of the in-plane displacement may be prescribed 
- Portions of the
boundary of the plate
 Â may be subjected to a prescribed
in-plane force per unit length  . The in-plane forces must then
satisfy 
10.6.3 Flat plates with small in-plane
and large transverse deflections (von Karman theory)
This
version of plate theory is used to model plates that are subjected to
substantial loading parallel to the plane of the plate (usually due to loads
applied at its boundaries), and also experience substantial out-of-plane
displacement. The theory uses a
nonlinear strain measure to account for the in-plane stretching that results
from finite transverse displacement and rotation, and includes nonlinear
terms associated with the in-plane loading in the equilibrium equations. The theory can be used to estimate the
shape of a buckled plate if the buckling loads are exceeded. Â
We make the following
assumptions
- The variation of
displacements within the plate conforms to the usual approximations of
Kirchhoff plate theory;
- The displacement of
the mid-plane of the plate has the form
 :
all three displacement components are considered.
- The in-plane
deflections are small, and satisfy
 Â for all  ;
second order terms in these displacement components are ignored in all
the strain definitions and also the equilibrium equations. The out-of-plane displacement is
assumed to be small enough to use a linearized measure of
curvature. However, the terms
involving products of  Â are retained when computing the strain
of the mid-plane of the plate, so that the stretching due to transverse
deflection is considered approximately.
- The in-plane forces
are assumed to be much larger than transverse forces. Nonlinear terms in the equilibrium
equations involving in-plane forces are retained; those associated with
transverse loading are neglected.
Most of the governing
equations of Von-Karman plate theory are identical to those listed in the
preceding section. Nevertheless, the
full set of governing equations is give below for convenience.
Kinematics:
 The
in-plane strain tensor is approximated by  . The additional, nonlinear, term in this
expression is the main feature of Von-Karman theory.
 The
curvature change tensor has components 
 The normal
vector to the deformed plate can be approximated as 
 The
displacement field in the plate is approximated as 
 The
(infinitesimal) strain field in the plate is approximated as  .Â
Kinetics
 The
external force is characterized by the force per unit area  Â acting on the surface of the plate.
 The
transverse stress tensor  ,
so the Internal forces are characterized by the in-plane stress resultant
tensor  ,
the transverse force tensor   and internal moment tensor  . The physical significance of the components
of these tenors is discussed in Sections 10.6.1 and 10.6.2
Stress
resultant-strain and Moment-Curvature relations
 Â Â Â Â Â 
Equations
of motion  reduce to
 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 
where
the rotational inertia term has been neglected in the last equation.
Edge
boundary conditions:
- The boundary
conditions for transverse displacement
  and/or the internal moment   and transverse force   are identical to those listed in
Section 10.6.1
- The boundary
conditions for in-plane displacements
 Â and/or in-plane forces  Â are identical to those listed in
Section 10.6.2.
Alternative forms for the Von-Karman
equations: If the plate is in
static equilibrium (so the velocity and acceleration of the plate is zero),
the Von-Karman equations can be written in a compact form by expressing the
in-plane forces  Â in terms of an Airy stress function  ,
following the procedure outlined for plane elasticity problems in Section
5.2.   As a result, the governing
equations can be reduced to a pair of coupled, nonlinear partial differential
equations for   and  . These formulas will not be given here, but
can be found, e.g. in Timoshenko and Woinowsky-Krieger, `Theory of Plates and
Shells,’ McGraw-Hill (1964).
10.6.4 Stretched, flat membrane with
small out-of-plane deflections
This
is a simplified version of the stretched plate theory outlined in 10.5, which
can be used if the plate is so thin that internal bending moments can be
neglected.  The problem to be solved
is illustrated in the figure. A
`membrane’ with Young’s modulus  ,
Poisson’s ratio  ,
mass density  ,
and thickness h is initially planar
and lies in the plane perpendicular to the  Â direction. The edge of the membrane is
subjected to a load per unit length  Â and prevented from moving transverse to the
membrane. A force per unit area   acts on the membrane, inducing a small, time
dependent, transverse deflection  .
Kinematics:
 The
in-plane strain tensor is approximated as 
 The
displacement field in the plate is approximated as  . We assume that  .
 The
curvature of the membrane has components 
 The
(infinitesimal) strain field in the membrane is approximated as 
Kinetics
 The
external force consists of a force per unit area  Â acting on the surface of the plate.
 The
internal forces are characterized by the stress resultant tensor  Â (the internal moments are neglected).
Stress
resultant-strain relations  Â Â Â Â Â Â
Equations
of motion are approximated as
 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â
The
second equation can also be expressed in terms of displacement as

Edge
boundary conditions On the edge
of the membrane
- The transverse displacement
must satisfy

- The in-plane forces
must satisfy
 ,
where n is a unit vector in
the  Â plane perpendicular to the edge of the
membrane.
10.6.5 Membrane equations in cylindrical-polar
coordinates
In
this section, we re-write the governing equations for a stretched membrane in
a cylindrical-polar coordinate system, to provide a simple example of the use
of general curvilinear coordinates. We
re-consider the membrane described in the preceding section, but now assume
that the membrane is circular, with radius R.
HEALTH WARNING: We use polar coordinates  Â as the choice of curvilinear
coordinates. However, all vector and
tensor quantities will be expressed as covariant or contravariant components
in the natural basis for this coordinate system, not as components in a cylindrical-polar basis of unit vectors  .    Â
Coordinate
system and kinematic relations
- Let
 Â be a fixed Cartesian basis of mutually
perpendicular unit vectors, with  Â normal to the plane of the undeformed
membrane.
- The position vector of a point in the membrane
can be expressed as

- The natural basis vectors and the reciprocal
basis (for the undeformed membrane) follow as

Here the reciprocal basis has simply been written
down by inspection  you can readily verify that  . Note that neither the natural basis vectors
nor the reciprocal basis vectors are unit vectors.
- The Christoffel
symbols for the coordinate system and the curvature tensor for the
undeformed membrane follow as

- The position vector of a point in the deformed
membrane is

- The natural basis vectors and reciprocal basis
for the deformed membrane follow as

where terms of order  ,
etc have been neglected in the expression for  . The reciprocal basis vectors can also be
calculated, but are not required in the analysis to follow.
- For small transverse
deflections, the Christoffel symbols associated with the deformed
membrane can be approximated using those for the undeformed
membrane. The curvature tensor
for the deformed membrane has covariant components

Notice that the curvature components all have
different units  this is because the basis vectors themselves
have units. It is easy to check that the terms in the dyadic product  Â all have correct units.
Equations
of Motion: The
general equations of motion for a shell are
 Â 
We proceed to simplify
these for a flat membrane.
- No external moments
 Â act on the membrane, and the membrane
thickness is assumed to be so small that the internal moments   can be neglected. We may also assume  .  The equations of motion in the
right-hand column then show that transverse forces  Â must vanish, and that the in-plane
forces   are symmetric  . Â
- Substituting for the
Christoffel symbols and curvature components into the remaining
equations of motion and recalling that in-plane forces
 ,
we find that the three remaining equilibrium equations reduce to

Boundary
conditions:
- The transverse displacement must satisfy
 Â on the edge of the membrane at r=R.
- The in-plane forces
must satisfy
 ,
where  Â is the force per unit length acting on
the edge of the membrane at r=R.
Special
case: membrane subjected to uniform biaxial in-plane loading: If the membrane is subjected to a uniform radial
force per unit length  Â acting on its edge at r=R, the first two equations of motion and the boundary
conditions are satisfied by  . This corresponds to a state of uniform
biaxial tension in the membrane. The
equation of motion for the transverse deflection reduces toÂ

|